emergent communication
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.04)
- Europe > Denmark > Capital Region > Copenhagen (0.04)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.95)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Hampshire County > Amherst (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Stanford (0.14)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.14)
- (7 more...)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.05)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Hudson County > Hoboken (0.04)
- (7 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- North America > United States > Florida > Miami-Dade County > Miami Beach (0.04)
- (8 more...)
NeurIPS2021_emergent_group_communication (7).pdf
We generate 128,000 images as agents' observations using python's matplotlib library Hunter [2007] V ariational autoencoder [Kingma and Welling, 2014] is used to encode the observations. Input is flatted 30,720-dimensional vector (32 by 320 by 3). Both encoder and decoder have one hidden layer with the dimension size being 1,024. The output (communication message) is a 10-dimensional vector. ReLU is used as the activation function.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden > Vaestra Goetaland > Gothenburg (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- South America > Uruguay > Maldonado > Maldonado (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Education (0.46)
- Government (0.46)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Emergent Communication for Rules Reasoning
Research on emergent communication between deep-learning-based agents has received extensive attention due to its inspiration for linguistics and artificial intelligence. However, previous attempts have hovered around emerging communication under perception-oriented environmental settings, that forces agents to describe low-level perceptual features intra image or symbol contexts. In this work, inspired by the classic human reasoning test (namely Raven's Progressive Matrix), we propose the Reasoning Game, a cognition-oriented environment that encourages agents to reason and communicate high-level rules, rather than perceived low-level contexts. Moreover, we propose 1) an unbiased dataset (namely rule-RAVEN) as a benchmark to avoid overfitting, 2) and a two-stage curriculum agent training method as a baseline for more stable convergence in the Reasoning Game, where contexts and semantics are bilaterally drifting. Experimental results show that, in the Reasoning Game, a semantically stable and compositional language emerges to solve reasoning problems. The emerged language helps agents apply the extracted rules to the generalization of unseen context attributes, and to the transfer between different context attributes or even tasks.